Plenty of us shout things at our printers.
But what if yours heard you? Of midpriced all-in-one (AIO) printers, none is more cutting-edge—and attentive—than the HP Tango X ($199) and its less expensive sibling, the HP Tango ($149), among the first printers to support voice control.
They are designed to work primarily with mobile devices—desktop PCs and laptops are an afterthought—and they have the unique distinction of letting you print snapshots from your smartphone for free, in a sense (more on that later).
We tested the Tango X, which delivers print speeds, output, and running costs comparable to similarly priced competitors without all the smarts.
All these things and more elevate the HP Tango X to our first Editors' Choice in a budding category: the smart, or smart home, printer.
Let's Talk Tango
When I took the Tango X out of its box, my 20-year-old daughter commented that it looked like it was made by Apple.
I realized that, ever since I had first laid eyes on it a week or so earlier, I had been thinking the same thing.
But it's more Apple-esque once the printer is laid bare.
I'll explain.
The only difference between the Tango and the $50-pricier Tango X is that the latter comes with a fabric "wrap" that folds around the printer, essentially disguising what it is.
The wrap comes in colors dubbed Blue Woven and Gray Woven.
The material feels like a hardcover book's cover, upholstered in fabric.
It folds around the top, front, and bottom of the printer, as shown below.
Why the wrapper? According to HP's research, most home and apartment dwellers don't want an unsightly printer mucking up the décor.
The wrap does hide the printer attractively and, when open, provides a nice cloth runway on which printed pages can land.
In my case, though, the Blue Woven wrap on my Tango X (a relatively neutral color) neither matched nor blended with my office and my living room.
It isn't gaudy or overstated, but it seems like a hit-or-miss add-on.
There is one drawback to the wrap's design.
On the section where printed pages land is a cloth loop, shown in the images above and below.
A few times during testing, it interfered with printed pages as they emerged from the output slot.
Occasionally, a page came out so fast that it butted up against that loop and stopped.
The subsequent page then caught the edge of that page and curled upward, causing the next pages to slide in under the curled one, and so on, throwing pagination out of whack.
This didn't happen all that often, though.
And given that most Tango X print jobs will be short documents (10 pages or less), it isn't the nuisance it would be on a higher-volume printer.
Given, however, that the loop's only purpose appears to be displaying the HP logo, the best fix would have been to nix it.
Aside from the two cloth wrap colors, you also get a choice among three color schemes on the printer body itself: Wisp Gray for the non-X Tango, and Wisp Gray Peral and Dark Gray Peral for the Tango X.
The color is applied sparingly, just to the face, and that portion is visible only when the paper-input tray is open.
Otherwise, the Tango and Tango X are white all around.
Without the wrap, and with the paper tray closed, the Tango X measures 3.6 by 15.3 by 9.7 inches (HWD) and weighs 7.5 pounds.
With its lid open and ready for service, it's about 7 inches taller and 2 inches deeper.
Though it looks trimmer than most AIOs, as well as a few mobile AIOs, the Tango X's footprint is only slightly smaller.
HP's own OfficeJet 250 Mobile All-in-One($379.99 at HP), for example, measures about the same with its trays closed, but it expands to a significantly larger 10.6 by 15 by 15.8 inches when open and ready for service.
Note, too, that while the Tango printers use the same printhead as the OfficeJet 250 Mobile, the latter model is designed for travel.
The Tangos aren't, though their chassis are small and light enough to lug around.
In contrast, the entry-level, well-under-$100 HP DeskJet 3755, once touted by HP as the world's smallest AIO, is only slightly smaller and 2.6 pounds lighter than the Tangos.
Several other Tango competitors, such as the Canon Pixma TR8520, the Pixma G4210, and the Brother MFC-J995DW INKvestment All-in-One, though, are (in one way or another) notably larger and heavier than the Tango, by several inches and at least 10 pounds.
Paper Handling and "Scanning"
Reflecting how lightweight it is, the Tango X is one of the least capable models mentioned here in terms of print volume and paper capacity.
Its paper tray, positioned at the back of the chassis (shown in the image below), holds only 50 sheets of paper, five envelopes, or 20 index cards or sheets of photo paper.
Even though the Tango X has no scanner bed or scan feeder, HP dubs it an "all-in-one" printer because you can scan and copy with it, via your mobile device's camera and HP's Smart App control application.
I'd say that's a stretch, but it does work.
In the Tangos' scan and copy processes, you, essentially, are the scanner's moving parts, replacing the document feeder, the scanner bed, and the sensor that moves beneath the glass, capturing the page image.
Smart App is, then, your scanner's interface.
Its home screen contains several tiles (Windows 10-like buttons) that initiate various "Scan to..." workflow profiles.
The preset profiles include Scan to Email, Scan to Copy, and so on, and you can edit existing profiles or create new ones.
After clicking a Smart App "Scan to..." or Copy tile, the app activates your smart device's camera and walks you through the rest of the task.
During the procedure, Smart App prompts you to take a picture of the document or photo you want to scan or copy.
(HP, throughout the Tango documentation and promotional material, calls the actual snapping of an image here "scanning.") It's fine for single impromptu pages, not so much for keeper photos or multipage documents.
HP rates the printer for an effete maximum monthly duty cycle of 500 pages, with a 100-to-300-page recommended monthly print ceiling.
By comparison, the Brother MFC-J995DW's duty cycle is 5,000 pages, while the HP DeskJet 3755 has a 1,000-page maximum monthly rating.
(Canon doesn't provide volume stats on its consumer-grade printers.) In addition, the Tango models can't print two-sided pages automatically, which is unusual for a $200 printer.
But then, neither can the $400-list Canon Pixma G4210.
Connectivity consists of dual-band Wi-Fi and Wi-Fi Direct.
The Tango X has no USB port or other means of connecting by cable to anything apart from its AC outlet.
Beyond the Wi-Fi, your phone can transmit traffic to the Tango X via the same cellular network it uses for calls, texting, and the like.
From an iOS or Android smartphone or tablet, you can contact the printer from anywhere via the HP Smart App.
If you need to print from a desktop PC or laptop, you can download Windows drivers from HP's site, but you'll still want to do the initial setup with Smart App.
If This, Then Print
Nowadays, everything from your microwave to your TV is smart, and as smart home technology advances, the actual meaning of the term "smart home" evolves.
The Tango X is "smart" primarily because it supports voice-activated printing.
That doesn't mean that you can simply set it up, turn it on, and start talking to it.
It has to be on the same Wi-Fi network as a supported smart home user interface device.
Currently, the Tango and Tango X support Amazon's Alexa devices, Google Home, and Windows' Cortana.
I should note here that the Tango and Tango X are not the first family/home AIOs with voice support.
A few months before the Tangos debuted, Canon released several Pixma TS- and TR-series models with smart home and cellular-network features.
(we should be reviewing these Pixmas in the coming weeks.)
Much of the behind-the-scenes Internet of Things (IoT) action is handled by relatively simple If This Then That (IFTTT) scripting.
HP provides several rudimentary scripts for voice-activated printing tasks, and you can find gobs of customizable scripts on the Internet.
(For an introduction to this automation, check out How to Control Your Smart Home With IFTTT.)
IFTTT is versatile, but you can't use it to make a printer or any smart device do something it isn't capable of.
The Tango X, for example, can't order a pizza, though some smart devices can.
The Tango X prints and scans and makes copies—sort of—as well as sends notifications to your smartphone or email, sends scanned documents to the cloud, and so on.
Basically, if the Tango X can do it, you can use IFTTT to not only tell the Tango X to do it, but also how to do it—such as, say, print this week's schedule at 7 a.m.
on Monday mornings.
HP's Smart App allows you to print to virtually any HP printer, not just the Tangos, from mobile devices locally and remotely.
When connected to a Tango printer, though, HP Smart App downloads additional files and configures itself to support Tango's unique features, such as the ability to scan and copy from your smartphone mentioned earlier.
The Tango X and the HP Smart App also send you notifications, including print-job completion, ink and paper levels, printer errors, and if your wrap is closed—no matter where you are—via Wi-Fi or Wi-Fi Direct locally and over the cellular network remotely.
The Tango X is also the first home printer I know of with a sensor that approximates the input tray's paper level (not the exact number of sheets, mind you) and sends that data to Smart App.
In fact, you can do just about everything remotely from your phone via your cell provider's connection that you can do locally.
Note that nearly all of HP's printers, as well as most competing models, are capable of printing remotely, via email attachments or other such arrangements via mobile apps similar to HP Smart App.
The difference here is that, with more conventional methods, you get little or no status feedback and control over your printer, which in part is what gives the Tango "smart" status.
Low-Volume, Entry-Level Print Speeds
As cool as the Tango X is, it's one of the slower $200 printers I've tested.
As its 50-sheet input tray and low page-per-minute (ppm) speed rating suggests, this is not a speed-demon printer.
(HP rates it at 11ppm for monochrome pages, 8ppm for color.) If you need to make more than a few hundred prints or copies each month, this is not your AIO, unless you don't mind sacrificing a little waiting time with every print to gain the Tango's smart features.
See How We Test Printers
I tested the Tango X over Wi-Fi (again, no wired interfaces are available on it) from our standard Intel Core i5-equipped testbed PC running Windows 10 Professional.
Now, most users will print to the Tango X from a smartphone or tablet, but since Daxdi historically tests printers using wired connections, and, since Tango comes sans USB and Ethernet ports, I chose to benchmark it this way to keep the regimen as comparable as possible.
I also printed several test documents from a few different mobile devices, though.
I discovered that, compensating for the speed (or lack thereof) of the smartphone or tablet itself, once the print data gets to the printer, the print speeds are similar, no matter what computing device—phone or computer—compiled the imaging data.
The Tango X printed my 12-page monochrome Microsoft Word text document at the rate of 9.6ppm, somewhat slower than HP's rating.
Canon's Pixma TR8520($199.99 at Amazon), in contrast, printed the same 12 pages at 12.8ppm, and Brother's MFC-J995DW($283.09 at Amazon) managed 10.5ppm.
The slowest text document printers in this group were Canon's bulk-ink Pixma G4210 and HP's petite, low-end DeskJet 3755, which churned at 8.3ppm and 4.3ppm, respectively.
Continuing my benchmark tests, I then printed several colorful graphics- and photo-laden PDFs, some Excel spreadsheets and full-page charts and graphs, and few full-page PowerPoint handouts.
I then combined those results with the scores from the previous 12-page text document test.
The Tango X churned at a very sluggish 1.8ppm, which, barring the HP DeskJet 3375's 1.4ppm, is the slowest page rate I've recorded since mid-2016, the starting point of the current PC Labs testing methodology.
To compare: The Pixma TR8520 churned at 4.7ppm, the Pixma G4210 managed 4.5ppm, and the MFC-J995DW took the lead at 7.7ppm.
When printing our highly detailed and colorful 4-by-6-inch test snapshots, the Tango X's time of 59 seconds brought up the rear, with HP's other AIO in this bunch coming in second to last, at 46 seconds.
Still, the Tango's photo output quality is more than respectable, so 59 seconds isn't unreasonable.
Let's get into that next.
Hey Tango, Nice Shot
Poor print quality is not an issue with inkjet printers nowadays, be they entry-level printers or $500-plus models.
The Tango X performs where it counts.
Text prints clearly and is well-shaped at common point sizes (8 to 24 points).
Even tiny fonts that, for some folks, require magnification to read proved highly legible in test prints.
I wouldn't hesitate to use the Tango X's text output for both internal and external business documents.
The same can be said about the PDF, Excel, and PowerPoint documents I printed.
I noted some very minor banding here and there.
(Few users would notice it, without looking specifically for flaws.) Where the Tango X shines, though, is in printing photographs.
It's only a four-ink printer, which limits its color range and detail a bit, compared to five- and six-ink photo printers from Canon and Epson.
But again, only professional printer reviewers and, perhaps, serious photographers would notice or care.
The only drawback is that, while it can print borderless photos, those are limited to 5-by-7-inch snapshots, tops.
The two Canon Pixma models and the Brother AIO discussed here print borderless pages up to letter-size (8.5 by 11 inches).
Often, borderless finishing (called "bleeds" in the printing and document-design worlds) can mean the difference between a good-looking photo or document and a high-impact, professional-looking work of art.
The Only Way to Tango: Instant Ink
Even if you print 100 pages a month or less with the Tango X (or most other HP home inkjets, for that matter), buying ink off the shelf—at a whopping 6.3 cents per monochrome page and 16.5 cents per color print—just doesn't make fiscal sense.
HP's Instant Ink program is a near-necessity for this...
