Daxdi now accepts payments with Bitcoin

Etymotic ER3 SE Review | Daxdi

The Etymotic ER3 SE earphones are the companion pair to Etymotic's excellent, Editors' Choice-winning ER3 XR.

Both are priced at $179, and both offer flat response that borders on clinical—the audio is crisp, bright, and clear, and the bass depth isn't pushed forward as it so often is in most modern in-ears.

Thus, bass lovers should steer clear, but sound professionals and music lovers seeking a truly accurate experience will be thrilled to find an option in this price range.

Get the ER3 SE if you're looking for the flattest response possible, though we prefer the XR model slightly for providing just a bit more of a bass edge.

Design

The ER3 SE are not stylish earphones.

But they provide a lightweight, ergonomic, in-ear fit that angles upward when the flange eartips are worn, and creates a seal unlike most in-ears we test.

They ship with two pairs of flange eartips (in two sizes) and a pair of foam eartips that, for some users, will also boost the bass a little more.

The fit, whether with the foam tips or the flange tips, is about as secure as in-ears get.

Getting the right fit with the flanges can be tricky, but the audio performance that they facilitate is top-notch.

If you feel like the eartips fit but the bass is lacking tremendously, go up a size and see if that changes things.

In addition to the eartips, you also get a shirt clip and a small zip-up carrying pouch.

But probably the most unique accessories here are the filters—tiny insertable cylindrical ends for the earpieces' nozzles that smooth out the frequency response a bit, but their main job is to protect the drivers from earwax.

Thanks to an included tool, they're relatively easy to install, though they're also relatively easy to lose.

In a move we rarely see in sub-$200 earphones, the four-foot cable is detachable, which adds value.

The cable lacks an inline remote—an omission that doesn't seem in sync with the year 2018.

All audio control will need to be done on your device itself, and there's no mic for fielding phone calls.

The cable has a built-in cinch slider and a snap-on shirt clip.

Internally, the earpieces house balanced armature micro-drivers that deliver a frequency range of 20Hz-16kHz, with an impedance of 22 ohms.

Both pairs of ER3 earphones share the same frequency range—they are tuned differently, however, and thus have different frequency responses.

Performance

On tracks with intense sub-bass content, like The Knife's "Silent Shout," the earphones deliver a clarity in the low frequencies we rarely hear.

The sub-bass presence is there, but it isn't dialed up to thunderous levels.

Just as clear and present are the high-mids and highs, providing contour and definition.

Lovers of booming bass will find the ER3 SE's bass response lacking, but this is the real thing—flat response can sound strange in our current bass-boosted era.

Bill Callahan's "Drover," a track with far less deep bass in the mix, gives us a better sense of the ER3 SE's general sound signature.

The drums, which can sound defiantly thunderous on a bass-forward in-ear pair, seem staid and dialed back here—not thin or brittle, but not powerful or round.

Callahan's baritone vocals fare better—they get some low-mid richness that gives them a bit more presence, but mostly, this is a crisp affair.

His vocals get treble edge, as do the acoustic guitar's attack and the higher register percussive hits.

On Jay-Z and Kanye West's "No Church in the Wild," the kick drum loop receives plenty of high-mid presence to accentuate its punchy, sharp attack.

The sub-bass synth hits that punctuate the beat are not as intense as we might typically hear them.

Plenty of studio monitors use this type of frequency response, but as more music incorporates sub-bass as a natural element in the mix, not being able to reach down to the deepest lows and deliver them clearly, with the intended effect, feels like a bit of a limitation.

Orchestral tracks, like the opening scene from John Adams' The Gospel According to the Other Mary, sound wonderfully balanced.

The lows and highs sound as they should, and nothing is pushed forward in the mix.

If you have the correct in-ear seal, the lower register instrumentation has some notable presence at times, but it isn't due to boosting—that's how the piece sounds.

Some listeners may find this sound signature slightly thin, but lovers of classical music and jazz will likely appreciate the clarity and accuracy.

Conclusions

Compared with the ER3 XR, it's possible that even some engineers and musicians will prefer the XR over the SE's flat response.

The bass depth is extended somewhat through the XR, allowing for a slightly more round, full bass presence.

Between the two, it'll come down to personal preference, and we prefer the XR earphones as they can push out a little bit more of the bass depth modern mixes often apply in bulk.

As far as other models in the general price range, RHA's CL750 are less accurate, though we love the way they sound, and plenty of listeners will prefer the subtle sculpting and boosting applied across the frequency range.

For more money, the Etymotic ER4 XR and ER4 SR are both excellent in-ears that deliver even more accuracy.

For the price, however, the ER3 SE in-ears are a fantastic, accurate tool that will be invaluable to many sound professionals and music aficionados who seek flat response.

Cons

  • No inline mic or remote.

  • Not for bass lovers.

The Bottom Line

The Etymotic ER3 SE earphones deliver audio in a pure flat response sound signature—they're an invaluable tool, but they're not for everyone.

The Etymotic ER3 SE earphones are the companion pair to Etymotic's excellent, Editors' Choice-winning ER3 XR.

Both are priced at $179, and both offer flat response that borders on clinical—the audio is crisp, bright, and clear, and the bass depth isn't pushed forward as it so often is in most modern in-ears.

Thus, bass lovers should steer clear, but sound professionals and music lovers seeking a truly accurate experience will be thrilled to find an option in this price range.

Get the ER3 SE if you're looking for the flattest response possible, though we prefer the XR model slightly for providing just a bit more of a bass edge.

Design

The ER3 SE are not stylish earphones.

But they provide a lightweight, ergonomic, in-ear fit that angles upward when the flange eartips are worn, and creates a seal unlike most in-ears we test.

They ship with two pairs of flange eartips (in two sizes) and a pair of foam eartips that, for some users, will also boost the bass a little more.

The fit, whether with the foam tips or the flange tips, is about as secure as in-ears get.

Getting the right fit with the flanges can be tricky, but the audio performance that they facilitate is top-notch.

If you feel like the eartips fit but the bass is lacking tremendously, go up a size and see if that changes things.

In addition to the eartips, you also get a shirt clip and a small zip-up carrying pouch.

But probably the most unique accessories here are the filters—tiny insertable cylindrical ends for the earpieces' nozzles that smooth out the frequency response a bit, but their main job is to protect the drivers from earwax.

Thanks to an included tool, they're relatively easy to install, though they're also relatively easy to lose.

In a move we rarely see in sub-$200 earphones, the four-foot cable is detachable, which adds value.

The cable lacks an inline remote—an omission that doesn't seem in sync with the year 2018.

All audio control will need to be done on your device itself, and there's no mic for fielding phone calls.

The cable has a built-in cinch slider and a snap-on shirt clip.

Internally, the earpieces house balanced armature micro-drivers that deliver a frequency range of 20Hz-16kHz, with an impedance of 22 ohms.

Both pairs of ER3 earphones share the same frequency range—they are tuned differently, however, and thus have different frequency responses.

Performance

On tracks with intense sub-bass content, like The Knife's "Silent Shout," the earphones deliver a clarity in the low frequencies we rarely hear.

The sub-bass presence is there, but it isn't dialed up to thunderous levels.

Just as clear and present are the high-mids and highs, providing contour and definition.

Lovers of booming bass will find the ER3 SE's bass response lacking, but this is the real thing—flat response can sound strange in our current bass-boosted era.

Bill Callahan's "Drover," a track with far less deep bass in the mix, gives us a better sense of the ER3 SE's general sound signature.

The drums, which can sound defiantly thunderous on a bass-forward in-ear pair, seem staid and dialed back here—not thin or brittle, but not powerful or round.

Callahan's baritone vocals fare better—they get some low-mid richness that gives them a bit more presence, but mostly, this is a crisp affair.

His vocals get treble edge, as do the acoustic guitar's attack and the higher register percussive hits.

On Jay-Z and Kanye West's "No Church in the Wild," the kick drum loop receives plenty of high-mid presence to accentuate its punchy, sharp attack.

The sub-bass synth hits that punctuate the beat are not as intense as we might typically hear them.

Plenty of studio monitors use this type of frequency response, but as more music incorporates sub-bass as a natural element in the mix, not being able to reach down to the deepest lows and deliver them clearly, with the intended effect, feels like a bit of a limitation.

Orchestral tracks, like the opening scene from John Adams' The Gospel According to the Other Mary, sound wonderfully balanced.

The lows and highs sound as they should, and nothing is pushed forward in the mix.

If you have the correct in-ear seal, the lower register instrumentation has some notable presence at times, but it isn't due to boosting—that's how the piece sounds.

Some listeners may find this sound signature slightly thin, but lovers of classical music and jazz will likely appreciate the clarity and accuracy.

Conclusions

Compared with the ER3 XR, it's possible that even some engineers and musicians will prefer the XR over the SE's flat response.

The bass depth is extended somewhat through the XR, allowing for a slightly more round, full bass presence.

Between the two, it'll come down to personal preference, and we prefer the XR earphones as they can push out a little bit more of the bass depth modern mixes often apply in bulk.

As far as other models in the general price range, RHA's CL750 are less accurate, though we love the way they sound, and plenty of listeners will prefer the subtle sculpting and boosting applied across the frequency range.

For more money, the Etymotic ER4 XR and ER4 SR are both excellent in-ears that deliver even more accuracy.

For the price, however, the ER3 SE in-ears are a fantastic, accurate tool that will be invaluable to many sound professionals and music aficionados who seek flat response.

Cons

  • No inline mic or remote.

  • Not for bass lovers.

The Bottom Line

The Etymotic ER3 SE earphones deliver audio in a pure flat response sound signature—they're an invaluable tool, but they're not for everyone.

Daxdi

pakapuka.com Cookies

At pakapuka.com we use cookies (technical and profile cookies, both our own and third-party) to provide you with a better online experience and to send you personalized online commercial messages according to your preferences. If you select continue or access any content on our website without customizing your choices, you agree to the use of cookies.

For more information about our cookie policy and how to reject cookies

access here.

Preferences

Continue